Comparison
交易所盘|秒合约盘|交割合约|加密货币|永续合约|发售币|质押挖矿| vs 高速代理-飞机代理-免费代理-公益加速器-公益节点
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @jiaoyisuo0117 | @tgfjdl |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 20,374 | 10,030 |
| Avg views | 11,937 | 6,720 |
| Engagement rate | 58.6% | 67.0% |
| 30-day growth | — | — |
| Language | 中文 | 中文 |
| Category | — | — |
| Channel age | 224 days | 3136 days |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@jiaoyisuo0117
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
@tgfjdl
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.